Carrier Task Force Destroyed
Alexander B. Cuppett
US Army & Action Officer, the
Joint Chiefs of Staff (Retired)
366 Graves Mill Rd, Madison, VA 22727
31 August 2005
General Richard Meyers, Chairman, the
Joint Chiefs of Staff
INFO: CNO, VJCS; CSA; SMA, CSAF; CMC, CINCEUR-SACEUR;
USEUCOM, CINCPAC; CINCPACFLT, CINCLANT, CINCLANTFLT;
COMSUBPAC, COMSUBLANT, CINCCENT, CDR-JCSE, CGSOUTHCOM,
CGFORSCOM, CGNORTHCOM, CG ALASKAN COMMAND; Senator Allen,
and Congressmen Goode and Cantor.
Predicted Destruction of a US Navy Carrier Task Force
My Ltr to you, Subj:
Defeat of the USS Kitty Hawk’s Radar Surveillance “Screen”
in WESTPAC, dtd, 10 Feb 2002 (NOTAL)
Ltr was sent to you and fourteen Flag Officers, including
nine Members of Congress, conclusively proving that the
Soviets now have “spoofing” capabilities which can defeat
our best radar technology. The following will inform you of
our coming naval defeat as a result of this “pilfered”
capability. Moreover, you can thank Bill and Hillary Clinton
for the spoofing technology transfer in 1993-1994. The ref
Ltr also details how this transpired; and can be found on
page 129-130 of the book, “America
Sold Out”, published in 2003.
General, I have a friend who, during the nine years I have
known him, has never been wrong on any “prediction” he has
made. This includes, but is
not at all limited to,
the Dow-Jones Industrial’s “bottom-out” on 24 Sept 2002; and
the rise of “per-barrel” oil prices, to the very dollar
amount(s) this year! The subject prediction, detailed below,
concerns the US Navy.
days ago my friend was given a Holy Ghost vision of a US
Navy Carrier Task Force, consisting of fifteen ships and
three subs, being attacked by Chinese (PRC) forces. In the
scenario there was a “football-shaped
fleet” (see Attach) sailing in formation. There
were fourteen surface ships ahead of/or around the flagship,
a CVA/CVN. Suddenly the carrier, which was in the center of
the formation, was hit on the port side. A huge hole opened
and the carrier then “slowed
and shuddered to a stop.” Before any planes could
be launched it rolled 30 degrees to port, casting all
aircraft into the ocean. It then rolled to 90 degrees and
capsized; all in a matter of a few minutes. (Enemy surface
and subsurface elements were also operating.)
that point the entire formation was struck by missiles, each
ship being hit; including “two
submarines”, which were operating submerged on
the flanks of the CVA. This included the loss of a “rover,”
fast attack sub, which was also in the Task Force.
Subsequently, enemy aircraft over flew the fleet; therefore
it must be ascertained the attacking planes were never
detected by the radar screen. The ships were sunk by
“air-to-surface” missiles, whereas the subs were sunk with
“air-to-subsurface” devices. I suspect the missile which hit
CVA had a “nuke tip.” I also suspect the recent Sino-Soviet
exercises were perfecting their operations plan(s) to attack
our WESTPAC units. Be advised the “bait” will be an incident
with Taiwan; and the Russians and the North Koreans shall
be, in some manner, involved in the scenario.
entire formation was sunk; not one element/unit surviving.
The loss of life was great. Be advised, the gentleman having
this vision has absolutely no knowledge of US Navy surface
or subsurface operations/tactics; to include convoy
screening techniques. Have a great day, sir, as you and the
other “Chiefs” are going to need a bunch of them -- soon.
respectfully, yet sorrowfully, with warm regards,
Bronze Star & Purple Heart
Medals, et al, RVN,
Secretary of Defense
Civilian Service Medal,
the Joint Staff, 1990
Joint Meritorious Unit
Award, the Joint Staff,
years “joint service” during my 31-plus years of service to
the USA; in over 35 countries.]
P.S. The expected
destruction of Florida by apocalyptic cyclones has also been prophesied by the
same man; and confirmed by several others.
Be advised that Hebrew University professors, using the HBC,
predicted all 39 Scud missile strikes on Jerusalem in the
Gulf War; thus, only one person died [of a heart attack]
because he was too stubborn to evacuate his apartment, as
IDF-ordered. I also know by prophetic
New World Order operatives shall strike a major US landmark; and deduced logic
says the “militia” may
be blamed so a UN-cops-run “gun collection” scenario can begin.
TASK FORCE DEPLOYMENT AT TIME OF ATTACK
ROVER SUB (on ASW patrol)
Capital Warship-B Large warship, type not known by the
Capital Warship-C Warship, type not known by the
DD -- DESTROYER
SUBMARINE (SSN) EACH SUB WAS OPERATING AT A DIFFERENT DEPTH
---- A FAST ATTACK --
ASW SUBMARINE “ROVING”
CVA - CARRIER (Independent “observer” thinks CVA will be the
USS Kitty Hawk, if not decommissioned)
Missile attack comes from port side OF THE FORMATION
INITIAL ATTACK: ATTACKING PRC-AF SORTIES NOT DETECTED UNTIL
AFTER THE ATTACK COMMENCES
MASSIVE LOSS OF LIFE - FEW SURVIVORS
CVA HIT – SLOWS RAPIDLY, LISTS TO PORT AND CAPSIZES IN SHORT
ATTACK THAN CONTINUES FROM THE AIR, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE
WEAPONS WILL BE “SURGICAL” SWIFT, ACCURATE AND DEADLY IN
COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF THE SURFACE SHIPS AND SUBMARINES
NOTE: SHIP DESCRIPTION IS AS ACCURATE AS IS POSSIBLE FROM A
ACTUAL TYPES OF SHIPS CANNOT BE VERIFIED BUT DEPLOYMENT, AS
DEPICTED, OF THE VESSELS AND SUBS WILL BE THE ACTUAL
FORMATION AT THE TIME OF THE ATTACK.
THE CURRENT GLOBAL “BALANCE OF POWER” WILL SHIFT AS A RESULT
OF THIS ACTION.
Navy Lacks Plan to Defend
Against "Sizzler" Missile
Report: Chinese Develop Special
"Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft Carriers
Advanced missile poses substantial new threat for U.S. Navy
U. S. Naval Institute
March 31, 2009
With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more aggressive in
asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U.S. Navy seems to
have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.
After years of conjecture, details have begun to emerge of a "kill weapon"
developed by the Chinese to target and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.
First posted on a Chinese blog viewed as credible by military analysts and then
translated by the naval affairs blog Information Dissemination, a recent report
provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) that can strike
carriers and other U.S. vessels at a range of 2000km.
The range of the modified Dong Feng 21 missile is significant in that it covers
the areas that are likely hot zones for future confrontations between U.S. and
Chinese surface forces.
The size of the missile enables it to carry a warhead big enough to inflict
significant damage on a large vessel, providing the Chinese the capability of
destroying a U.S. supercarrier in one strike.
Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature and a
maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds that it can
evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is estimated that
the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range of 2000km in less
than 12 minutes.
Supporting the missile is a network of satellites, radar and unmanned aerial
vehicles that can locate U.S. ships and then guide the weapon, enabling it to
hit moving targets.
While the ASBM has been a topic of discussion within national defense circles
for quite some time, the fact that information is now coming from Chinese
sources indicates that the weapon system is operational. The Chinese rarely
mention weapons projects unless they are well beyond the test stages.
If operational as is believed, the system marks the first time a ballistic
missile has been successfully developed to attack vessels at sea. Ships
currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack.
Along with the Chinese naval build-up, U.S. Navy officials appear to view the
development of the anti-ship ballistic missile as a tangible threat.
After spending the last decade placing an emphasis on building a fleet that
could operate in shallow waters near coastlines, the U.S. Navy seems to have
quickly changed its strategy over the past several months to focus on improving
the capabilities of its deep sea fleet and developing anti-ballistic defenses.
As analyst Raymond Pritchett notes in a post on the U.S. Naval Institute blog:
"The Navy's reaction is telling, because it essentially equals a radical change
in direction based on information that has created a panic inside the bubble.
For a major military service to panic due to a new weapon system, clearly a
mission kill weapon system, either suggests the threat is legitimate or the
leadership of the Navy is legitimately unqualified. There really aren't many
gray spaces in evaluating the reaction by the Navy…the data tends to support the
legitimacy of the threat."
In recent years, China has been expanding its navy to presumably better exert
itself in disputed maritime regions. A recent show of strength in early March
led to a confrontation with an unarmed U.S. ship in international waters.