Unleavened Bread Bible Study
(semi-weekly radio program)
Outreach Teleconference Ministry
UBM Women in Prayer
Audio & Video Archives
Miraculous Testimonies
Revelations & Teachings
Prophecies, Dreams & Visions
Hidden Manna For the End Times
(vital information)
Gifts to Support UBM
Prayer Ministry
Prison Ministry
Television
Ministry
Free Teaching Materials
UBM Banners
Bible Tracts
Website Archives &
Back-ups
Christian Books
Christian Music
Christian Artwork & Poetry
Recommended Links
1901 ASV Bible in
Audio
Bible Helps
E-Sword Modules
Quick Scripture
Helps
Scripture Greeting Cards
FAQ
Ministry Contacts
Technical Support
End-Time Revelations for America & the World -- Hidden in Scriptures,
Prophecies, Dreams & Visions.
Teachings to Empower True Disciples to Walk in the Steps of Jesus.
Judicial analyst and former federal judge
Andrew Napolitano blasted a controversial bill in Massachusetts and warned that
the public would resist. During an
interview on Fox News, the well-known freedom advocate also described
various powers the legislation purports to authorize — e.g., forcibly
quarantining residents without a warrant — in the name of quelling a
public-health threat such as that supposedly presented by the swine flu virus.
And he told the Fox News show host that the legislation appeared to be on track
for passage.
The legislation purports to authorize search and seizure without warrants,
price controls, government prohibitions on freedom of assembly, warrantless
arrests, and other alarming powers. The bill also claims it would shield
virtually everybody involved from liability — including the vaccine
manufacturers on down to the people injecting it. The bill passed the
Commonwealth’s Senate unanimously, though the House clerk’s office told The
New American that the bill had not yet cleared the House of
Representatives.
After explaining that the H1N1 (swine flu) virus had made thousands of Americans
sick and that some worry it could become a pandemic, the Fox host said the
proposed bill claims to authorize warrantless quarantines and even the
imposition of martial law. “Could that possibly be constitutional?” Regardless,
the state’s chief executive plans to sign it, according to Napolitano.
The bill would allow the governor to declare an emergency and authorize
“non-healthcare-licensed personnel” — which Napolitano suggested would be police
— to vaccinate people against their will. The former judge noted that instead of
forcing adults to take the shot, the statute authorizes incarceration without a
warrant, charges or a trial. Children, on the other hand, could be removed from
their parents and force-vaccinated, he added.
The screen read “Unconstitutional law?” and “bill being called ‘draconian’”
underneath while the host described the bill as troubling on many levels. He
wondered if the government would compile a list of everybody who received the
swine flu shot, and if it would encourage neighbors to snitch on each other for
failing to take the vaccine.
“Look, this is the reason why we have federal judges,” explained Napolitano,
though other legal experts have warned that the courts would not step in.
“Because federal judges in Massachusetts will have to take this statute and
compare it to the Constitution. And the Constitution says the police can’t break
into your home, and the police can’t take your children away, and parents decide
what medication the children get, not the government.”
If this nightmarish scenario comes to fruition and police were to
force-vaccinate children, “it’s going to hit the fan,” the host warned.
Napolitano also cautioned against passage of the bill, saying: “The state of
Massachusetts will be sorry it enacted this, because people will revolt against
it.”
There has already been widespread criticism and opposition mounting against the
bill, with groups like the Liberty Preservation Association of Massachusetts
leading the charge. Natural News editor Michael Adams warned that the
state was delving into medical fascism and said the bill transforms the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts into a “medical police state” while turning
citizens into government property.
The bill is indeed wildly overstepping the bounds imposed by the Supreme Law of
the Land, but it is symptomatic of a larger trend across the country. Dozens of
states already have forced-vaccination and quarantine statutes, while the
federal government claims the authority to detain Americans indefinitely over
medical issues and even more frightening powers than the states have allowed. It
would certainly be a welcome development for the courts to step in, but as
Napolitano warned, the prospect of citizens revolting against these draconian
measures is not hard to imagine.
Nurses Plan Rally to Protest Mandatory Swine Flu Shot Paul Joseph Watson -
9/22/09
Albany health professionals question
safety of hastily introduced H1N1 vaccine
Albany nurses and other
health professionals are planning to stage a rally next week to
protest a state regulation that mandates they will lose their
jobs if they refuse to take the swine flu shot, as fears grow
about the vaccine’s dangerous ingredients and government plans
to forcibly inoculate whole populations with the H1N1 jab.
Earlier today we reported on the case of “Clare,” a daycare
worker in Albany who, despite having minimal contact with
hospital staff who work in a separate building, an exemption
allowed in the official decree, was ordered to take the seasonal
flu shot on the spot or be fired. She was also advised that the
same procedure would be in place for the swine flu shot, as is
outlined in the New York State Department of Health’s emergency
regulation issued in August.
Now nurses across the
state are standing up against government intimidation to take
the shot, pointing out that the vaccine has not been properly
tested and contains mercury, squalene and other dangerous
additives.
The New York State Nurses
Association is supporting a demonstration on behalf of nurses
set to take place next week,
reports Newsday.
“This vaccine has not been
clinically tested to the same degree as the regular flu
vaccine,” said Tara Accavallo, a registered nurse in Stony
Brook’s neonatal intensive care unit, the division that has
produced a number of protesters. “If something happens to me, if
I get seriously injured from this vaccine, who’s going to help
me?”
Accavallo says she is
willing to lose her job if need be, which is exactly what will
happen to thousands of other health professionals on November 30
if the government refuses to back down.
Rob Kozik, another
registered nurse in Stony Brook’s neonatal intensive care
unit, said he has no problems with a seasonal vaccine but he
has deep concerns about being immunized against H1N1. “I
usually get vaccinated against the flu, but they are
mandating an untested and unproven vaccine,” Kozik told
Newsday
“The H1N1 vaccine
already has a poor track record,” he added. “Back in 1976
there was vaccine [to protect against swine flu] that caused
death and Guillain-Barre syndrome,” said Kozik, referring to
a nerve-damaging disorder that some people linked to the
vaccine. He said he also worries about the vaccine additive
thimerosal, which is used as a preservative in some doses of
the vaccine.
According to Dr. Steven
Walerstein, medical director of Nassau University Medical Center
where H1N1 vaccinations have already started, 25 workers at the
institution refused to take the shot and were later “referred to
human resources and counseling.”
If polls are proven accurate, at least a third of nurses and
health workers in the U.S. and the UK will refuse to take the
shot, with another third still undecided.
The fact that health
professionals, and even employees loosely affiliated with
hospitals, are being intimidated into taking the shot, proves
President Obama’s claim that the vaccine will be voluntary to be
deceptive and misleading. At the very least people’s livelihoods
are on the line if they refuse to be injected and elsewhere,
in countries such as Ireland and Greece, authorities have
threatened large fines and jail time for people who refuse the
vaccine.
As we have previously
documented, the
swine flu vaccine was rushed through safety procedures while
governments have provided pharmaceutical companies with blanket
immunity from lawsuits arriving out of the vaccine causing
deaths and injuries.
It was previously revealed
that some batches of the
vaccine will contain mercury, a toxin linked with autism and
neurological disorders. The vaccine will also contain the
dangerous ingredient squalene, which has been directly
linked with cases of Gulf War Syndrome and a host of other
debilitating diseases.
It was also recently
reported that the UK government
sent a confidential letter to senior neurologists telling
them to be on the alert for cases of a brain disorder called
Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the
vaccine. The CDC in America
replicated this warning weeks later.
As a result of the dangers
of the vaccine becoming widely known, authorities are moving to
get out ahead of the story by acknowledging that millions of
health problems in the aftermath of a vaccination campaign will
be blamed on the vaccine, citing the 1976 swine flu debacle when
the shot proved far deadlier than the actual virus.
Reuters reports that public health officials, “Expect an
avalanche of so-called adverse event reports, which are reports
of death, illness or other health trauma that occur within two
weeks after receiving treatment — in this case, the swine flu
vaccine,” in reaction to an estimated “one million heart
attacks, 700,000 strokes and 900,000 miscarriages.”